Electric Motor Repair Half Life
In the 2006 Advanced Energy study and report, “Achieving More with Less: Efficiency and Economics of Motor Decision Tools,” on page 40, a Weherhaeuser report on electric motor reliability is discussed with the following conclusions:
- 50% of new motors fail in seven years; and,
- 50% of rewinds last only 3.5 years.
This would seem to support the notion of a repair half-life. It also identifies that not all facilities enjoy the 20 to 30 year average motor life discussed in numerous articles and research papers. Usually, the failures will relate to improper application, contamination, misuse, or other outside influences placing stresses on the electrical, mechanical or both types of systems within the machine. As I have mentioned in the past, an electric motor makes an excellent, but expensive, fuse.
What makes a repaired motor, or some repaired motors, more susceptible to these issues than a new electric motor while others are not?
In the 1995 Bonneville Power Administration (US Department of Energy) report, “Industrial Electric Motor Repair in the United States,” it is outlined that: 80 percent of repair facilities change winding configuration, often without understanding the potential consequences of the changes; 41% of repair shops reported burn-out temperatures in excess of 750 degrees F; and, “proper testing, which may include tests for insulation integrity, winding resistance, vibration, rotor balance, and core loss is essential for all repairs. It appears that only insulation testing is done routinely.” Comprehensive, or even basic testing, is performed by fewer than half of the motor repair facilities.
It has been found through numerous studies, including the 1995 Canadian Electrical Association (CEA 9205 U 984), “Evaluation of Electric Motor Repair Procedures Guidebook,” that proper and improved processes will provide similar, or improved, reliability as new. A combination of the studies and results can be found in the 1997 IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine Article, “Anatomy of and Energy Efficient Electric Motor Rewind,” (Penrose) and other papers that can be found at http://www.motordiagnostics.com/presentations.htm.
Alternative motor repair processes, such as low temperature coil removal processes, special machining processes, automated coil winding, trickle varnishing systems, and quality control systems is outlined in the 1995 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference paper, “Time Savings and Energy Efficiency through Alternate Electric Motor Rewind Methods.” (Penrose, H. W. and Bauer, B.) This paper outlines the only process that can provide a true 24 hour turnaround for motors under 400 horsepower without having to make shortcuts. The result is energy efficiency, reliability, and a turnaround time that will allow for rapidly returning a facility to operation for critical machines.
Some of the issues that can impact the life of an insulation system, including how to calculate the expected life of an insulation system, can be found in R. L. Wall’s IEEE DEIS Web video, “Fundamentals of Motor Insulation for Repair Shops: Part 3,” http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/deis/education/video-detail/education/fundamentals-of-motor-insulation-for-repair-shops-part-3.html.
If you have questions or comments on this topic, please email me at hpenrose@dreisilker.com.
Follow the MotorDoc on Twitter: http://twitter.com/motordoc or find me on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/motordoc
Sincerely,
Dr. Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP
IEEE DEIS Web Editor in Chief (http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/deis)
